About CrashAudit · Independent crash games hub
About CrashAudit — who we are and what we do
We are not a casino. We are an independent affiliate site, founded in 2026, focused on crash games from InOut Games and the operators that ship them. Below: who writes the reviews, how affiliate commission actually works, and why we have walked away from four operator partnerships this quarter.
Crash games researcher · CrashAudit · May 14, 2026
Why this site exists
Most English-language crash-game coverage is one of two things: machine-translated content lifted from Eastern European affiliate networks, or thinly disguised operator marketing. The "top 10 best crash casino" articles rarely disclose who tested, when, or with what bankroll. They cite RTP figures from operator press releases without checking which RTP variant the casino actually integrated. They recommend brands that have outstanding payout complaints in industry forums.
Our operational commitment is direct: every casino on this site is tested with real money. We deposit our own funds (between $50 and $200 per operator), play the 100-200 round minimum on the crash title under review, attempt at least one withdrawal, and document the elapsed time. If a withdrawal stalls, that goes in the review as a red flag — without rounding off the corners.
Negative reviews are not rare here. If an operator has an unverifiable licence, abusive T&C (50×+ wagering, hidden max-bet ceilings, "casino reserves the right to void winnings" boilerplate), or a documented pattern of payout disputes in independent forums, we still publish the page — as a warning rather than a recommendation. Traffic to those warning pages saves readers from the same mistake we already paid to test.
Affiliate disclosure is explicit. Every casino link uses a /go/ wrapper with rel="sponsored" attached. You see when you are clicking a commercial link, and you see that the site continues to function whether or not you click.
How we make money
Pure affiliate model: we earn commission when you register at an operator through our link and make at least one deposit. Typical commission is 25-45% of the operator's net revenue from your account (or a flat per-qualified-signup fee, depending on the programme). We do not earn per click, do not earn per visit, and do not earn if the operator refuses to pay you.
That structure has natural alignment: an operator that withholds payouts from players eventually withholds payouts from affiliates too. Recommending bad operators kills our medium-term revenue, so the only sustainable business model is selecting carefully and saying no when the math fails.
We have refused four operator partnerships in Q1 2026. Reasons: a Curaçao licence number that did not resolve in the regulator portal; a T&C clause stating "the casino reserves the right to void winnings at its discretion"; and two operators with documented patterns of stalling withdrawals on Reddit gambling forums. Each pitched between $200 and $400 per qualified signup. We declined and left them off the site.
The team
Four researchers, one per language pair, each based in the region they cover. Reviews are written from scratch in each language — we do not translate one source review into other languages, because crash-game discourse and search intent differ enough by region that translation produces obviously machine-generated copy. Each researcher tests operators with their local payment rails (crypto, fiat, regional methods) and reviews from a perspective that fits the audience.
- Sam Kelly — English-language coverage. Background in software auditing and provably-fair architecture. Focus: crypto-first operators, technical correctness of provably-fair claims, and bankroll math. Contact: editor@crashaudit.com
- Lucas Guimarães — Portuguese (Brazil). Focus on the Lei 14.790/2023 regulatory transition and Pix payment flows.
- Антон Ковалёв — Russian. Coverage of internationally licensed operators serving CIS markets and the alternate-payment landscape.
- Priya Sharma / Tanzim Ahmed — Hindi and Bengali. Indian state-by-state regulatory variation (Sikkim, Nagaland) and Bangladesh offshore context.
How to contact us
Editorial submissions, factual corrections, partnership enquiries: editor@crashaudit.com. Response within 3-5 business days.
Privacy queries, GDPR/CCPA requests, analytics opt-out: privacy@crashaudit.com. Response within 15 business days (statutory).
We do not respond to "guest post" or "link insertion" pitches — we do not sell editorial space, full stop. Legitimate affiliate-partnership pitches should include the operator name and a verifiable licence reference.
Correction policy
We make mistakes. When we do, the page updates with a new modified-date and, for material errors (incorrect RTP, expired licence, etc.), a visible note explaining what changed and why. We do not silently edit corrections out of existence — owning the error keeps the editorial record honest.
What we will not do
Three things we will not do, regardless of commercial pressure:
- Sell predictors or "winning systems". Provably-fair architecture explicitly prevents prediction. Anyone selling a Chicken Road 2 predictor or Aviator algorithm is committing fraud, and the cryptographic specification is publicly available to verify that.
- Hide affiliate disclosure. Every CTA is marked sponsored and routed through /go/. You always know when a click is commercial.
- Recommend operators we have not tested with real money. New operators reach the recommendation list only after the five-step real-money test process completes — it takes time, and the list is short on purpose.